Pressure arrives.
SOC 2 deadline, buyer security review, disaster recovery gap, or Terraform drift the team can no longer defend.
how it works
The operating model is simple: inspect first, scope second, remediate with infrastructure code, then hand over evidence and the next queue. A skeptical CTO should grasp the engagement in under sixty seconds.
vishcore [how it works]
client@discovery:~$ vishcore delivery --mode evidence-first
→ read‑only review before any recommendation
→ rollout order matched to production risk
→ auditor-readable handoff after changes land
delivery workflow
Each step shows who owns the decision and what artifact comes out of it.
SOC 2 deadline, buyer security review, disaster recovery gap, or Terraform drift the team can no longer defend.
Client-created cross-account role with External ID, scoped to the scanner allowlist. No writes, no Terraform, no secret values read.
Controls evaluated, gaps classified into confirmed fix, owner context, permission-limited, or not observed.
The client confirms what should be fixed, what is intentional, and what stays out of scope. Vishcore does not decide alone.
Terraform pull requests or scoped manual changes only after written approval. Rollout order matched to production risk.
Before/after report, screenshots and API evidence, owner-context worksheet, and the auditor handoff.
safety boundary
Discovery uses a client-created cross-account role with External ID, scoped to the Vishcore scanner allowlist. No writes, no Terraform, no secret values read, no remediation during discovery.
policy · scanner allowlist + deny guardsInquiry email and fit-check exchange happen before any AWS access. No portal login, no access request, no secret values, no production credentials.
boundary · fit-check before accessEvery change ships as a reviewable Terraform pull request or scoped manual ticket, after the client confirms rollout order and exclusions. Discovery does not change production.
contract · signed scope · no auto-fixwhat discovery produces
The discovery scan returns a counts strip, a triage of every gap, a remediation queue sorted by production risk, and an owner-context worksheet for the items where business intent matters more than the control state alone.
The buyer sees the shape of the deliverable before approving paid work.
See the full sample scanIllustrative example based on the current Vishcore scanner report shape. The example is sanitized, client-safe, and not presented as a client endorsement.
Discovery uses read-only cloud metadata. It does not create, change, delete, remediate, or read secret values.
This is not an audit opinion, compliance certification, or guarantee that an environment will meet SOC 2 requirements.
~ $ vishcore report --input scan-result.json --format html
client@discovery:~$ vishcore report --input scan-result.json --format html
control counts
remediation queue · first 3
real engagements
Every row links to an approved client story on the work page. Same six steps, four named teams.
Fieldsafe Modernization pressure while legacy production had to stay up.
read full caseForcify Datacenter-to-AWS migration started with a read-only environment map, not a write.
read full casemfIQ Carve-out into a fresh Control Tower org, scoped before a single production change landed.
read full caseXPAN Five-account structure and Vanta integration confirmed with the client before remediation began.
read full caseXPAN Cross-region failover workflow driven by a single Terraform-controlled change.
read full casemfIQ SOC 2 evidence packets and CI/CD handed over for repeatable audit cycles.
read full caseSend the pressure point, cloud provider, audit timeline, and where Terraform is trusted or not trusted. Vishcore replies with focused next-step questions, not a sales pitch.